Pages

Thursday, June 27, 2013

In the Land of the Hoosiers

Sunset over the
Corn
Sunset over the Corn

Both sides of my wife’s family are from Indiana originally. Her parents were reverse pioneers, leaving the farmsteads of home behind to settle in the wilds of Rochester.  We've been back several times to visit both sets of grandparents, who grew up within miles of each other. The first time I had little idea what to expect; my prior mental impression of Indiana was primarily a vast corn field only interrupted by football fields and Republican headquarters. While that’s not wholly untrue, I have really enjoyed our trips there, especially to the grandparents’ farmsteads. Like many rural locales, it shares the same pace and sense of place as where I grew up[i]. Less topography, more corn, but the same faded signs on the sides of buildings, the same frozen parade of gargantuan John Deere contrivances across the local dealer’s yard, the same cozy local diners where the coffee is a valid substitute for diesel fuel, and the same generally congenial people.

And for the record, the whole state isn't covered in corn. There’s some soy too.

I've got
CORN
But yeah, a lot of corn.

After years in the urban flatlands of Houston, it’s always a refreshing change of scenery to get to Indiana. I’ve never really blogged about it, so I realized the other day I had accumulated a lot of great pictures and thought I’d share some of my favorites to give just a small taste of the place and its people[ii]. Obviously this is through the eyes of a non-native visitor, so your mileage may vary. Hopefully they convey my fondness for the place and family I have come to know there. It’s amazing how a place I’ve never been can make me homesick by proxy.

Tractor
Detail
Vintage Tractor

Old Cabinet
Wood
Old Cabinet Wood

Barn
Beams
Barn Beams

Flag Day Portrait
3
On the Porch

Lightning
Rod
Lightning Rod

Grandfather's
Stool
Grandfather’s Stool

Twin Kiss
(Sepia)
Twin Kiss 
(every rural town has an ice cream stand that doubles as a purveyor of local delicacies…in this case, pork tenderloin sandwiches)

Barn in Evening Light
(B&W)Old Window
(B&W)
Barn in Evening Light, Old Window

Indiana Sunset
4
Indiana Sunset

Grandfather Durr (B&W) 
Grandfather Durr 

Mother and Child (rose
tinted grayscale)
Mother and Daughter

New Old sign (antiqued)
Old Sign

LandscapeRailroad bridge
(B&W)Chief Kokomo
Aerial, Railroad Bridge, Chief Kokomo

Lightning Rod
(B&W)
Lightning Rod (B&W)

Dunham homestead,
Kempton Indiana (Obama ancestry)Hoosier
Homestead
Dunham Homestead[iii], Hoosier Homestead[iv]

Sherrill's
(antiqued)
Sherrill’s – Eat Here, Get Gas

Barn
Side
Barn Side

Shed
LineBower's Crunch
(antiqued)
Shed Line, Old Containers

Patterns in the
Wheat
Patterns in the Wheat[v]

The
Throw
The Throw (playing cornhole[vi])

His
Tools
His Tools

The Euchre
Game
The Euchre Game[vii]

Heritage
2Kate and the
Corn
Heritage, Kate and the Corn

The
McColginsOld Carnegie style
Library in Sheridan, Indiana
The McColgins, Carnegie Library in Sheridan

Indiana
Landscape
Indiana Landscape

NOTES




[i] Except for the odd choice of white to paint many of the barns instead of the standard issue red.
[ii] Enough so to refrain from Indiana-themed jokes, like Children of the Corn references, or shouting out "Hoosier daddy?"
[iii] The Dunhams are related in some manner or another to President Obama, and their house is right down the way from Kate’s grandparents’ homestead in Sheridan, Indiana. We never did figure out the specific relationship.
[iv] The Durr homestead is part of the historic Hoosier Homestead program, hence the sign.
[v] Shame on me, I have no idea if this is actually wheat, or whether it was sorghum, or some other grain that I have been unacquainted with since childhood.
[vi] Boy was that a moment of confusion when they announced they were going to play cornhole, a term I’d associated with a completely different context.
[vii] One of the best parts of these visits are the epic Euchre games, accompanied by neverending bowls of popcorn. I will admit that, as much as I love the sense of family closeness and interaction, part of my enthusiasm is based on being able to trot out the old joke “Left bower? Right bower? I AM the right bower”. 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

A Love, Supreme

Today two historical rulings came down from the Supreme Court[i], striking down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and vacating a decision upholding California’s Prop 8[ii]. A long hard road makes a brief rest stop for justice.  The devil is still in the details, and we can look forward to weeks of pontification and prognostication[iii] from the news show talking heads.  For the moment though, if I could virtually fist-bump Justice Kennedy and the other Justices of the majority, I would totally do so[iv].

I am an unabashed supporter of gay marriage. Love is Love. (I know it’s easy to say that on a blog read by a total of 3 people, maybe 4 if someone got lost on their way to Banana Republic’s website. It’s certainly a lot easier than being one of the people out on the front lines[v].)  I also know some of my friends and family disagree. I don’t write this to offend you, but at the same time, I am not worried about offending you in writing this. I love you, and I understand why you may not agree, and I understand that not all disagreement necessarily comes from a place of hate and intentional bigotry. But for me this is not a matter of relative interpretation. I respect the right to different views on gay marriage in general, but the legality of gay marriage is something I truly believe there is only one correct answer on because it is rooted not in emotional or moral arguments, but in the underpinnings of our legal tradition.  This is a matter of what it fundamentally means to be an American citizen.

The one enduring and fundamental pillar of the American democracy is the equality of all persons. It’s reflected in every aspect of a citizen’s standing before the government (one man one vote, etc.) We believed in this so much we carved it directly into the highest court of the land. On the façade of the Supreme Court are found four perfect words: “Equal Justice Under Law”. There is no more important aspect of the American way of life than this cornerstone principle. It is the foundation of our system of law and society as a whole. We came to this country in part to escape tyranny and to uphold the essential value of the individual. We fought wars, foreign and domestic, to throw off the yoke of elitism and inequality. Time and time again we have upheld the principle that if all are not equal under the law, none are. Without the bedrock of our equality before the law, our entire system of government and society collapses. Rule of law falls away. Liberty cannot cohabitate with tyranny.

Marriage involves two aspects; the “sacred” (comprising the religious, emotional, spiritual or other facets of personal and community values) and the “secular”[vi] (comprising the tangible legal and financial recognitions of the union). The opposition to gay marriage seems focused on the sacred, which is part of why those arguments are inherently incompatible with our democracy. The “sacred” aspects are important, but they’re not where this debate really pivots. They are not irrelevant in the greater sense, but they are irrelevant to the legal question at hand. It’s not because they don’t matter to us as a nation, but just that they are secondary to the legal protections of our system of law. Whether or not I disagree with what you say, feel, write, chant on the public green, wear, cook, read, or tattoo on your bicep is irrelevant to the question of whether you should be able to do those things. From the First Amendment on down this has been the mainstay of our consideration of the relationship between the individual, the community, and the state.  I have a right to think what you’re expressing or doing is wrong. I don’t have a right to stop you from doing it as long as it doesn't tangibly impact me. You want to say my favorite band is crap? You’re dead wrong, but I will always support your right to express your horrible music tastes.  There is no legitimate argument that gay marriage tangibly impacts anyone[vii], so it is inherently a matter of personal liberty. Yes, it may very well offend you, or you may think it violates your conception of the sacred aspects of marriage. You have every right to think whatever you care to about it. What our society has continually upheld in virtually every other aspect is that while you have the right to decry it, you don’t have the right to impose your opinion on someone else’s exercise of their liberty.

 It’s tempting to devolve into a repudiation of the moral and pseudo-legal arguments against gay marriage, and I’m not suggesting that this discussion isn’t important. But the fundamental equality of all American under the law trumps any concern raised, even if one found them legitimate[viii]. I’ll simply say I have yet to hear a single cogent argument against gay marriage which, well-intentioned or otherwise, doesn't stem ultimately from either bigotry or religious precept. Neither are acceptable reasons, absent any tangible harm, to deny someone’s liberty. To do so is legislating tyranny over liberty, which is antithetical to our Constitution and the rule of law.

The secular aspects of marriage are where the debate truly should be taking place[ix]. No one is forcing churches to marry anyone; that would be an intrusion into the sacred aspects of marriage. No one is forcing you to sing gay marriage’s praises. Civil marriage is a service provided by the government. It does not assume nor require adherence to a given religion or moral precept. Despite traditional language, it is solely recognition by the state of two consenting adults entering into a binding legal relationship. Churches have a right to decide who they provide their services to based on arbitrary distinctions. The government does not. We would be up in arms if the government denied fishing licenses to redheads, or if only Presbyterians were allowed tax-exempt status for their church properties. We've fought wars, real and social, to ensure that the color of one’s skin isn't a determinant for access to government and exercise of liberty. Neither separate-but-equal or straight out discrimination are acceptable alternatives for equality.

The argument is simply this: gays and lesbians are Americans first before anything else. They, like every other American, are guaranteed a relationship to their government based on equal standing before the law. They have a right to do, say, feel, and take actions we may think are wrong, just as every other American can. They pay taxes, they serve their country, and they have just as much to expect equal access to government services as anyone else. More importantly, they have just as much right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness as anyone else. To deny them an aspect of that based on a subjective opinion is wholly un-American.  It doesn’t matter that I think there are compelling moral and ethical reasons why gay marriage is a good thing, or why you may think it is the work of the devil, or anywhere in between. What ultimately matters is that we all get to think whatever we want, but we all get to go on with our lives and exercise our liberty DESPITE those opinions.

Today we took a step in that direction, but we’re not done walking.  




[i] For some reason the popular acronym SCOTUS just sounds dirty to me. I blame Scalia. Not because of any rational connection, but just because I pretty much blame Scalia for everything because he’s so blamable in general.
[ii] I previously posted a short but vitriolic bit about Prop 8 some time ago. How amazing is it that within the scope of a few years I am able to proudly say it has been relegated to the dust bin of history.
[iii] Also, probably pondering, politicking, pandering. From Fox “News”, paroxysm and polemic.  
[iv] And not just an anemic little fist bump….the cool kind where you each spread your fingers out afterwards and make a sound effect like “kapow” or something similar…as if the occurrence of the fist bump was so intense that it burst outward in sheer awesomeness on contact. You’re the man now, K-dog.
[v] I hope I have supported those people to the best of my ability over the years, but I can’t claim I have shared their experience   No matter how strident my support, I don’t have skin in that game…I’ve never had anything tangible at stake like many of my friends have. I got to marry the person I chose. I have no problem getting the full range of state and federal benefits recognition of my marriage. I get to be with her without being heckled, harassed, or my life put in danger. I can’t even begin to comprehend what it has been, and continues to be, like for these folks and millions more across the country.
[vi] I’ve argued before that government has no business muddling about in the sacred, and should stick only to the secular. Give us all civil unions; gay, straight, or what have you. Let people seek the sacred wherever they want to. If you want to be married in the church, go for it. If you want to call yourself married through a ceremony with friends at a Taco Bell, do it. If you want to be married by a minister, rabbi, good friend, swami, Ben Folds Five, or a particularly animate ficus tree, that’s your choice. People can agree or disagree about who’s married. You don’t have to recognize the marriage of the conservative couple next door, and they don’t have to recognize yours. But everyone has to recognize everyone’s civil unions. It separates the secular from the sacred. The government has no business in the sacred, and should stick to the secular and let people find the sacred for themselves. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and so on.
[vii] Especially any more than straight marriage does.
[viii] Which, yet again, I do not in any shape or form.
[ix] Though, again, I think there is an insurmountable moral/ethical argument to be made for gay marriage. It simply should be unnecessary because of the legal argument.  

Monday, June 24, 2013

Antiquities of the Republic

2013-06-23
12.26.14

Along the vast expanse of Highway I-10’s 24-lane wide corridor in Houston are a dense jungle of commercial enterprise. If it can be bought or sold, illicitly or otherwise, it exists somewhere along the barely penetrable tangle of feeder roads and strip malls along I-10[i]. It’s a bizarre, unplanned scramble of commerce falling over itself to tempt the traveler[ii].

1
We like roads…

One of the places I’ve passed a thousand times but never stopped at before now is a massive antiques and collectables mall. I’ve never been an antiques sort of guy[iii]…I appreciate the history and interest in pieces of the past but usually don’t feel the need to own many. Curiosity, however, got the better of me, and I decided to stop by this weekend and check the place out.

I have browsed through little antique stores in tourist towns, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything like this. It was an essentially a massive urban warehouse packed to the rafters with a combination of kitsch, furniture, and more kitsch[iv].  On opening the doors, I was met with a heady smell of dust, mildew, and desperation. Undaunted[v], I steeled myself and headed in.

2013-06-23
11.00.17
2013-06-23
11.13.132013-06-23
11.05.52
Warehouse, Don’t Just look Buy Something, Treasure of the Pharoahs

What struck me first was the seeming lack of patrons in such a vast space. In the middle of a busy weekend, the place seemed mostly populated by a few vendors[vi].   I roamed up and down the deserted aisles, feeling more like a latter-age archeologist than a consumer. The vendors peered at me through piles of vintage coke bottles and knick knacks, like vultures waiting for prey to come near enough to be of interest.

While some shops were themed and organized, the majority were a dizzyingly dense yard sale mélange of items. Stalwart old tools slowly rusted against the flanks of vast beanie baby armies. Armadas of knickknacks sat in shelved dry dock under rusted tin signs. Unrecognizable vintage machines patiently waited to fulfill their functions once again. Velvet Elvis stood regally watching over all.

Some of the items were awesome in their sheer ugliness. Some simply didn’t translate well to the modern era. Some just defied comprehension altogether.

2013-06-23
11.01.06
Creepy Elfin Heads

2013-06-23
11.01.55
Hookah Lamp makes smoking pot an illuminating experience.

2013-06-23
11.08.00
Shakespeare watches disapprovingly while you drink from his skull.
2013-06-23 11.08.13
Only $170 for a framed charcoal bag? Steal!

2013-06-23
11.09.20
Let’s put the whiskies in the kid-friendly, cartoony containers….nothing can go wrong here.

2013-06-23 11.15.33
Yup, still racist.

2013-06-23
11.16.452013-06-23
11.16.53
Apparently Produce and Pornography evolved from a common ancestor.

2013-06-23
11.23.12
Internet 1.0

2013-06-23
11.23.49
Those early iPhones sure were clunky…

2013-06-23
11.31.12
Plymouth Undies: They’re the Sneeriest!

2013-06-23
11.39.39
Welcome to the Eagle’s Nest (Hitler’s mountain chateau in WWII).
  
2013-06-23
11.43.00
I SHOULD NOT BE.


2013-06-23
11.45.32
There was a whole 360 degree view room filled with these creepy dolls. And their dead, dead eyes.

2013-06-23
11.45.53
I am Hilde! I am from Holland! I EAT SOULS.

2013-06-23
11.46.102013-06-23
11.46.15
Historical Bears. Sadly no Theobear Roosevelt.

2013-06-23
11.52.07
Working 9 to 5? Come relax on Dolly.

2013-06-23
11.58.532013-06-23
11.58.59
Native American artifacts from the Neversleepagain tribe.

Among the empires of junk, there were actually a few interesting relics (though still not interesting in the “this needs to be in my home” sense).

2013-06-23
11.09.52
Columbia Grafonola Record Player

2013-06-23
11.00.39
Well preserved Singer sewing machine with table

2013-06-23
11.16.25
Stained glass in reclaimed wood

2013-06-23
11.22.062013-06-23
11.22.15
These dowels were from a Houston yarn factory, I believe

2013-06-23
11.29.46
Poster from a Soviet Propaganda film

2013-06-23 11.44.34
Old school rocking horse

By the time I’d made my way through the main warehouse, my mind was already pretty overloaded. I had actually found two items that were kind of cool; an old wood and metal pulley (for hanging a flower basket or bird house) and a small sheesham wood and metal table for the patio[vii].

2013-06-23
11.03.36
2013-06-23
11.36.11
Old pulley, Sheesham table

After successfully haggling them down to reasonable prices[viii], they advised me I could not use credit card, but that there was an ATM in the “other building” and directed me toward a back door. A small desolate lot had a trail to an unmarked entrance which promised “More Shopz”[ix].

2013-06-23
12.16.21 2013-06-23 12.16.12 2013-06-23
12.05.06
Back Alleyway, More Shopz!, No more shops today please.

If the large open primary building seemed densely packed, this annex was nearly a rat’s warren of small, secluded shops. I crept through tunnels between the overflowing stock of Coin dealers, stamp dealers, a dealer of antique Japanese swords, vintage radio repairmen and some bored twentysomethings selling unopened action figures[x], to the ATM. Already burned out on the sheer mental onslaught of the place, I left these shops for another day[xi].

I haven’t told my wife yet about my antique purchases. We’ll see how that goes over.


NOTES



[i] Want a three-tiered driving range or high-end gun club? Are you a SCUBA enthusiast, giant palm tree lover, or Vietnamese grocery afficianado? We got you covered. 
[ii] It reminded me a bit of the armies of old with the vast retinue of whores, peddlers, cooks, blacksmiths, etc. following in their wake. A vast wagon train following I-10 on its march through Houston.
[iii] I appreciate nice antique furniture or the odd piece here and there, but more often than not it’s mostly a long game of sorting through tons of never-to-be-sold trash for the hope of finding a diamond in the rough. I understand why some people like it. There’s a sense of history/mystery/capitalistic voyeurism in peeking about in the collected debris of ages past. I appreciate artifacts of the past, I just don’t feel an overwhelming need to own them. For me, antiques stores are much more akin to museums than shops.  They’re also a source of unbounded potential to revel in the hilarity of the poor purchasing decisions of the past. It would be fair to say that I approach antiques semi-ironically.
[iv] It was like the warehouse in the final scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark, except this is where they send the stuff they have their less-than-top men work on it. Or like the hoard of a dragon with a pronounced lack of discerning taste.
[v] …and recognizing the blog post potential…
[vi] And just like people resembling their pets, the inanimate items were not the only antiques here. Most of the commercial activity here seemed to be vendors buying and selling from other vendors. Maybe it’s a Highlander thing…like eventually there can be only one, and they’re all desperately trying to accumulate the biggest pile of junk on which to survey their holdings in their future reign.
[vii] I almost felt a little guilty as I bought the table from the older lady at the booth. I could tell this may have been someone’s sentimental possession, and it was all but guaranteed I was going to stick it out in the Texas elements with a level of disregard that could only be called wanton.
[viii] My wife hates haggling, but I have no problem with it. In the world of antiques, I think it’s like the “three cups of tea” principle. It lets you know you respect their culture.
[ix] “I came here because the spelling on this sign appealed to me”, said no hip young urban person ever.  
[x] There is nothing quite so sad as action figures mint in box, never opened, never to be opened, never to be played with.
[xi] I put it on the calendar for 10: AM on “that day in which there is absolutely nothing else to do in the world, including alphabetizing my socks”.